Vulgarity of Dispute – Indian Army vs. Govt

Vulgarity is simply the conduct of other people.

~ Oscar Wilde

The skirmishes between the Indian army chief over the age dispute, the bribe issue, then the case of leaked letter over preparedness of Indian army, and now rumors of a coup highlight disgrace at the top. I personally couldn’t have imagined such a poor state of Indian Army, let alone it’s chief, and his disgraceful treatment by our top ministers. To put things straight, we are a successful democracy because we are a free nation. This freedom cannot come without a strong defense mechanism, and our top ministers are simply throwing tons of filth on the person at the helm of affairs of the army. One such example is that of Mr. Laloo Prasad Yadav.

Talking about corruption alone, it is not a closed room secret when it comes to defense deals. The noteworthy part however is its confirmation by a serving army chief. Although the timing of the news i.e. 18 months after being offered the bribe does raise some questions once can’t ignore the courage displayed by General V.K. Singh. Things have gotten murkier after a new PIL filed by some former bureaucrats challenging the appointment of Lt General Bikram Singh as the next Army chief.

It seems to me that in three instances i.e. 1) Age of General, 2) Disclosure of offered bribe, and 3) PIL by bureaucrats all point towards preventing Lt General Bikram Singh from becoming the next Army chief. Backing this stand are retired Admiral L Ramdass and former Chief Election Commissioner N Gopalswamy. But if this is true, why is the government opposing these forces?

In any case, the government has dealt with issue in a pitiful manner. I personally never imagined the powerlessness of the army chief and nor did I imagine how little regard our government had for the army.

Vulgarity begins when imagination succumbs to the explicit.

~ Doris Day

Advertisements

Godhra verdict: 11 get death

The Gujarat High Court, established in the yea...

The Gujarat High Court

11 convicts in the Godhra train burning case were on 1st march 2011 handed down death sentence while 20 others were given life imprisonment by a special court in the 2002 Godhra incident incident.

In 2002, the coach (S-6) of the train Sabarmati Express coming from Bihar (Darbhanga) destined to Gujarat (Ahmedabad) was burned in Godhra (Gujarat) . About 58 people were burned to death, which consists of mostly Hindu Pilgrims.

This event triggered a widespread communal violence in Gujarat that resulted in deaths of about 790 to 2000 Muslims and about 254 Hindus.

In the very first police FIR after the incident, the incident was viewed as an unplanned mob fury.

But, a special investigation team (SIT) of Gujarat state police put forth an argument that the act was pre-planned by a Muslim Group. It was said by the police that they had stockpiled about 140 liters of petrol a day before the attacks had to take place and the very purpose of these attacks was to kill the Kar-Sewaks.

In 2004, Railway Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav appointed Justice U C Banerjee to investigate Godhra incident.The Railways Ministry setup a commission that reported in 2005 that the fire was an accident. The Gujarat high court ruled the formation of this inquiry commission as “illegal” and “unconstitutional”. At present, all the reports of the commission by Railways stand invalid. Moreover, the outcome of this report has been questioned by BJP as politically motivated as its findings coincide with elections.

Special judge P. R. Patel considering this case as “rarest of rare” pronounced death penalty for 11 out of the 31 convicted in the case while 20 others were sentenced to life imprisonment.

“The court looking into their active role in the conspiracy and setting afire the S6 coach of Sabarmati Express train near Godhra, gave death penalty to 11 people,” public prosecutor J. M. Panchal said.

The court also slapped punishment on them under various other sections, which will be concurrent to their life term.

The prosecution had sought death sentence for all the 31 convicts, saying that it was a heinous act.

A special fast track court convicted 31 accused in Godhra train burning case.

Another 63 people were acquitted in the Godhra train burning conspiracy.

The special fast track court was appointed by Gujarat High Court after orders from the supreme court of India.

Mint Reports

Defence counsel I. M. Munshi said the convicts will definitely appeal against the punishment awarded to them.

“It (the punishment) is very difficult to swallow. Till we get the copy of the judgement, we cannot comment much,” Munshi said.

We definitely don’t what is more difficult to swallow – The killing of innocent people or the death sentence to those killed innocents. I think its the former.

Godhra Train Burning Results

Godhra verdict: Death for 11, life term for 20 – Economy and Politics – livemint.com.

2G Scam: Telecom policy sound; Problem is faulty implementation

Manmohan Singh, current prime minister of India.

Dr Manmohan Singh

Opposition charged the government saying that the ministry of finance and telecom were not on the same page on 2G spectrum allocation .

Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh in his reply appeared to blame A Raja for the faulty implementation of the telecom policy. He said that these problems will now be looked into by the JPC, they are being looked into by the PAC and if there are any criminal aspects, they are looked into by CBI.

ET Reports

Dr Manmohan Singh said he was “categorically” assured by Raja that the policy of first-come first-served was being implemented appropriately. “Subsequent developments suggest that this was not the case.” Singh said the “public impatience” over action against the guilty was understandable but the government must follow the due process of law. “We are making every effort. Those found guilty will be dealt with under law,” he asserted.

The ministry of Finance earlier had different views but they were later narrowed down and sorted with regard to 2G spectrum pricing. Hence there is no reason to question allocation

Telecom policy sound; fault lies in its implementation, says PM – The Economic Times.

Godhra Train Burning Results

Godhra Train Burning Episode

Gujarat Riots

A special fast track court convicted 31 accused in Godhra train burning case.

Another 63 people were acquitted in the Godhra train burning conspiracy.

The special fast track court was appointed by Gujarat High Court after orders from the supreme court of India.

The fast track court accepted the pre-planned conspiracy theory in the Godhra Train Burning case.

In 2002, the coach (S-6) of the train Sabarmati Express coming from Bihar (Darbhanga) destined to Gujarat (Ahmedabad) was burned in Godhra (Gujarat) . About 58 people were burned to death, which consists of mostly Hindu Pilgrims.

This event triggered a widespread communal violence in Gujarat that resulted in deaths of about 790 to 2000 Muslims and about 254 Hindus.

In the very first police FIR after the incident, the incident was viewed as an unplanned mob fury.

But, a special investigation team (SIT) of Gujarat state police put forth an argument that the act was pre-planned by a Muslim Group. It was said by the police that they had stockpiled about 140 liters of petrol a day before the attacks had to take place and the very purpose of these attacks was to kill the Kar-Sewaks.

In 2004, Railway Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav appointed Justice U C Banerjee to investigate Godhra incident.The Railways Ministry setup a commission that reported in 2005 that the fire was an accident. The Gujarat high court ruled the formation of this inquiry commission as “illegal” and “unconstitutional”. At present, all the reports of the commission by Railways stand invalid. Moreover, the outcome of this report has been questioned by BJP as politically motivated as its findings coincide with elections.

The judgement was pronounced on 25th February 2011 inside the high-security Sabaramati Jail in front of a camera on the outskirts of Ahmedabad.

The 31 accused have been held guilty on 2 major accounts of criminal conspiracy (Section120B) and Murder(Section 302) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The interesting part of the judgement is that the court has acquitted atleast two of the accused who the police has long maintained as “main conspirators”.

The first Moulana Umarji was alleged to have shouted on the Public Address System of a nearby mosque asking the people of Godhra to rush to the Railway Station and kill the Kar Sewaks on board the Sabarmati Express.

The second, Bilal Hussain Kalota who was then supported by congress was to have been the main person who collected the mob outside the railway station of Godhra for the prime purpose of setting fire the S-6 coach of the Sabarmati Express.

Among those convicted is the owner of the Aman Guest House, Abdul Razzak Kurkur, where a meeting was held the night before the Godhra train burning episode to plan and hatch the entire episode by the conspirators.

via The Hindu : Front Page : 31 convicted, 63 acquitted in Godhra train fire case.

Kasab awarded death sentence

Photograph of Ajmal Kasab, one of the ten terr...

Image via Wikipedia

Justice Ranjana Desai upheld the death penalty against Ajmal Kasab for waging war against India in an attempt to destabilize the democracy.

The reasons cited by Justice Ranjan Desai for the death penalty are as follows:

The most serious charge is his involvement in waging a war against the Indian government

The stability of Indian government is the most essential and crucial aspect for the very existence of democracy.

Justice Ranjana Desai said: “Perhaps the weightiest aggravating circumstance is that Kasab waged a war against the Government of India pursuant to a conspiracy which was hatched in Pakistan, the object of which was to inter alia destabilise the Government of India and to weaken India’s economic might.”

“He indulged in mindless killings of innocent people with a view to overawing the Government of India and achieving cessation of a part of Indian territory. There was an attempt to create ill will and disaffection among different religions of India so as to damage its secular fabric. Waging war is a serious crime which calls for deterrent punishment.”

“[Kasab and co-conspirators] challenged the Indian Army and the State Police. Kasab targeted the CST [Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus] which is under the command of the Central government. Kasab challenged the sovereign authority of the Republic of India which offence calls for the severest punishment.”

The 2008 Mumbai attacks (often referred to as November 26 or 26/11) were more than 10 coordinated shooting and bombing attacks across Mumbai, India’s largest city, by terrorists who invaded from Pakistani seawaters. Kasab’s trial was delayed due to legal issues, as many Indian lawyers were unwilling to represent him.

Kasab’s trial began on 6 May 2009. He initially pleaded not guilty, but later admitted his guilt on 20 July 2009. He initially apologized for the attacks and claimed that he deserved the death penalty for his crimes, but later retracted these claims, saying that he had been tortured by police to force his confession, and that he had been arrested while roaming the beach.

At least 166 victims (civilians and security personnel) and nine attackers were killed in the attacks. Among the dead were 28 foreign nationals from 10 countries.

“In view of  the magnitude of attack, indicative of the preplanning,” the court called Ajmal Kasab “a threat to society.”

The court said that Ajmal Kasab was individually responsible for seven murders.

Justice Desai said it was “impossible to say that he was misguided by the LeT [Lashkar-e-Taiba] and used by them as a tool. He voluntarily joined the terror outfit, decided to train for jihad and expressed his wish to carry out the 26/11 mission and he knew the consequences of his actions.

Why was Ajmal Kasab not pardoned by Justice Ranjana Desai
The court said that he did not appear to be repentant at all. He was perfectly sane. This portrays a scheming mind and not a mind of a mentally unstable person.
Referring to the Supreme Court’s observations that the punishment should befit the crime, the court rejected the argument that the death penalty would make a martyr of Kasab.
The court justified the death penalty by saying that in some cases, the harsh penalty of death is necessary to warn those who may want to take a similar path. The soft handling of a crime like this will erode the public confidence in the efficacy of law.
The magnitude of Kasab’s crime makes the sentence of life imprisonment inadequate. The court also said, “we feel we would never be as confident as we are today in confirming the death sentence.”

The Hindu : Front Page : Kasab waged a war against India: court.

Who is Ajmal Kasab ? (sequence of events)

  1. Mohammed Ajmal Amīr Kasāb is a Pakistani Islamic terrorist who was involved in the 2008 Mumbai attack.
  2. Ajmal Kasab is the only attacker captured alive by police and is currently in Indian custody.
  3. The Government of Pakistan initially denied that Ajmal Kasab was from Pakistan, but in January 2009, it officially accepted that he was a Pakistani citizen.
  4. 3rd May 2010: an Indian court convicted him of murder, waging war on India, possessing explosives, and other charges.
  5. 6th May 2010: The same trial court sentenced him to death on four counts and to a life sentence on five other counts.
  6. 21st Feb 2011: Bombay high court has upheld the death sentence

Why was Rahat Fateh Ali Khan detained ?

Rahat Fateh Ali Khan at the launch of his albu...

Image via Wikipedia

Rahat and his entire 16-member troupe were  on their way to Lahore via Dubai.

Rahat Fateh Ali Khan and his manager were to board a Dubai flight when the sleuths of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence detained them at Indira Gandhi International Airport on February 13

They were carrying an undeclared amount of USD 1.24 lakh (nearly Rs 60 lakh) and some other instruments too in foreign currency

As per norms, no one can carry beyond $5,000 in cash & $5,000 in other instruments.

If a person is carrying more than this amount he/she has to declare the amount to the Customs Department.

On 17th Feb, 2011, the DRI questioned Rahat and Maroof about the money recovered and their payments from their shows in India. Rahat was quizzed by DRI officials for 10 hours on Thursday.

Finally, Pakistani singer Rahat Fateh Ali Khan and Maroff (his manager) have been slapped a penalty of Rs 15 lakh each.

This is in connection with recovery of huge amount of foreign currency from them which currently stands confiscated with the DRI

Rahat Ali, manager slapped with Rs 15 lakh penalty each – Hindustan Times.

AIIMS inhuman treatment of Animals – Retire aging monkeys, Pamela Anderson urges AIIMS

Pamela Anderson

Image via Wikipedia

Pamela Anderson, also the brand ambassador of PETA (People for Ethical Treatment of Animals) has raised concerned on the inhuman treatment of monkeys, guinea pigs and rabbits kept at AIIMS for research purposes.

After being shown footage of the treatment of Animals at All India Institute of Media Sciences, also the premier medical facility in India, PETA and Pamela Anderson have raised concerned in a very strongly worded letter.

Pamela Anderson is helping in getting spotlight on the issue, whereas the cause is the ethical treatment of animals at AIIMS.

It is although a debatable issue, but doing research on animals can be the safest bet for testing new drugs and observing their reaction and side effects. Although on the other hand it is inhuman for the animals under test since once the test is done, they are given excess anesthesia and left to die.

So although it is a double edged sword, there should be some middle ground that the doctors at AIIMS will have to show. How soon will this path come ? Considering the state of affairs in India, I am unsure of any quick path. Looking at the pathetic state of research in India, there is a high probability that the animals would be left free.

Retire aging monkeys, Pamela Anderson urges AIIMS.